Technology and the changes IT Essay Example for Free

Technology and the changes IT Essay Technology and the changes it brings can have a very big effect on our lives. Which technological change has had the largest effect on life in this country? Why? Prepare at least a 350-word essay explaining the technology you have chosen and how it has affected our lives. As you write your paper, remember your essay will be scored based on how well you address the following: †¢ Develop a multi-paragraph response to the assigned topic that clearly communicates your controlling idea to the audience. †¢ Support your controlling idea with meaningful examples, reasons, and information based upon your research or readings. †¢ Organize your essay in a clear and logical manner, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. †¢ Use well-structured sentences and language that are appropriate for your audience. †¢ Edit your work to conform to the conventions of standard American English The digital divide is beginning to close. The flow of digital information – through mobile phones, text messaging, and the Internet – is now reaching the world’s masses, even in the poorest countries, bringing with it a revolution in economics, politics, and society. In my opinion, the technological innovation that has had the greatest impact on our lives in this country today would be the mobile telecommunication technology. For the last ten to fifteen years, mobile phones have changed our lives in such a way that no other technological change has before. Earlier, people used to book telephone calls in advance, had to go and use near the telephone booths, or sit beside a physical telephone instrument kept in the drawing room of a house, and attend to, or make calls stuck to a place. Now, people simply carry a 200 gram device in their pockets and can travel the world, always connected to their loved ones and business partners, no matter in whatever remote part of the world they are. (However, in certain countries, mobile coverage does

Gay Marriage Will Help America Essay -- argumentative, persuasive

Why is gay marriage such a big deal? Why are there so many people against it? Most of the time it is easy to presume where to draw the line when interfering with someone else’s rights. Simply, do not do it. Everyone has the right to get a driver’s license or has the freedom of speech, but why on earth do some people have the right to wed and think that he or she has the right to tell somebody else that he or she does not have that same right? Gay marriage is not traditional, gay relationships are immoral, and marriage is for procreation. Gay marriage is a perfectly acceptable decision that any citizen should be able to make for themselves. A gay California man, whose partner died in the September 11 terrorist attacks has become "legally vulnerable in ways he could never imagine". Keith Brodowski lost his life partner, Jeff Coleman, to American Airlines flight 11, which was the first plane to hit the World Trade Center. Coleman was a flight attendant. Brodowski is now battling the state and the nation for survivors' benefits, granted to the widows of those who died. It took powerful words of Keith’s testimony to move legislation to grant partial inheritance rights for registered domestic partners in California. Married couples had to go through nothing of this caliper for their benefits. In a survey conducted by Partners Task Force for Gay and Lesbian Couples, over fifty percent of lesbians and forty percent of gay men had faced problems obtaining employment benefits, lower tax rates, and insurance breaks because civil unions are not recognized as a legal marriage. Other discriminations included employment, hospital visitation, adoption, and many more. These problems could have been eliminated if the couple had been legally m... ...y not believe in the same sexual likings as us, they are still people who live among us. People with different religions do the same and they are allowed to get married and spend a life together. Why shouldn’t gays? References Bidstrup, S. (2000). Gay Marriage: The Arguments and the Motives. Veritas Et Ratio - Truth And Reason. Retrieved from website on March 19, 2011. From . Head, T. Arguments against same-sex marriage - Debunking 10 Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage. Civil liberties at about.com - Your guide to civil liberties News and Issues. Retrieved from Website on March 19, 2011. From . Should gay marriage be legal?. Gay Marriage ProCon.org. Retrieved from website on March 18, 2011. From .

Human societies Essay

In understanding human beings and human societies, no subject is more important than social stratification and its relationship with wages. A system of social stratification helps shape how people live, their opportunities for a better life, their mental health and how long they will live. Generally it is a system of social stratification has an important influence on events like wages, unemployment and inflation. Most people know that some people are rich and some are poor, but people in general are usually not aware of the systematic social forces that create the outcome of where they are placed on the ladder or why they are paid what they are. Most believe they take what they get. This type of belief is strong among the nonpoor and white of the United States and in recent times with immigration. Employers of immigrants will pay less, even less than minimum wages because of that person is illegal. Most people are unaware of the fact that some individuals have more influence than others that can shape the general social welfare. Those people usually are the least aware of how a system of stratification forms the basis for these influences and this is a possible factor in why wages follows social stratification differences. To begin we need to define the difference between social differential and social stratification. Social differential is a necessary precondition for social stratification. Social differential is the distinct individual qualities and social roles. This is very important when looking at reasons for unequal pay in American Society. People are differentiated by biological characteristics such as sex, size, strength, and agility. In every society they are differentiated by social roles, work tasks, or occupations. Some people do the hunting others chop wood and others care for children or gather plants. As societies become more complex technologically, the division of labor increases the number of tasks, occupations, and roles will grow too. An increased division of labor means more differentiation. Several arguments for unequal pay include the differences between men and women as reasons. It stated that women live longer than men so they should be paid less to balance this out. Another said that women were more likely to have tardiness and absences which added to labor cost and in order to balance this out women are paid less. Health care and medical insurance costs needs to become more balanced because women live longer and can become pregnant life (Barber, 1957). Social inequality is the condition that people have unequal access to valued resources, services and positions in the society. Such inequality can come in terms of wages and how individuals or groups are themselves ranked and evaluated by others most importantly; social inequality in wages is related to differing positions in a social structure. Social inequality often rises from social differentiation for two reasons. First because of the human capacity to apply meaning to events and things and to develop judgment of what is good or bad, social evaluation is often applied to differences. This could explain why the wages are unequal across the board. Individual characteristics and different positions or roles may be valued unequally or ranked from superior to inferior that is why social inequality is looked at in terms of prestige or honor for more pay. Inequality may rise from social differentiation because of some roles or social positions place some people in a position to acquire a greater share of valued goods, services and pay (Giddins & Held, 1982). Two of the most important types of inequality are inequalities of income and wealth. These two are of major importance because it is income and wealth that bring other valued goods and services, not to mention the basic necessities of life. Income and wealth are generalized commodities that depending upon the quantity and how they are used by bring power and influence. By income I mean money, wages and payments that are timely made and received as returns from a job or investment. Income is usually the means by which most Americans obtain the necessities and simple luxuries of life. A wage or salary, rather than investments, is what sustains the vast majority of people in this country. Wealth is accumulated assets in the form of various types of valued goods. Wealth is anything of economic value that is bought and sold. Most Americans have little or no wealth, whatever they have gotten in the form of wages and salaries cannot be saved because it must be used for immediate necessities. Income is distributed in a highly unequal manner in this country, but wealth is distributed even more unevenly (Liao, 2006). The majority of people in this country must depend upon some type of employment for their income and the occupational structure is of primary importance in creating this unequal distribution of income. Part of the inequity between men and women is due to simple sexism. The standard of living and real income of people in the United States have generally increased over the years. But the distribution of total income has remained stable since the middle 1940’s. There is data showing that income inequality was reduced somewhat during the 1930’s and early 1940’s due to Depression reforms and full employment during World War II. Among noncommunist industrial nations the United States can generally be ranked about midway in terms of income inequality. France is the highest amount of income inequality(Barber, 1957). The most commonly recognized class inequality is income. The usual assumption is that working class people receive below average incomes, the middle class receives average incomes, and the upper middle class professionals and managers receive above average to high incomes. The more traditional assumptions about class income inequalities are much closer to the truth. This is the belief that working class people have made substantial income gains relative to the middle class is incorrect because of two facts. That high working class incomes are not your typical income and also that even though some blue collar workers pay is high it is usually because of it being seasonal or insecure (Giddins & Held, 2006). There is no simple explanation between income and class position because of the many variables that help determine income attainment. The first problem has been that in the past occupational status or occupational skill level alone was assumed to indicate class position. There is no argument that much of the income inequality between men and women or whites and minorities can be explained by the historical conditions of racism and sexism in our society. But much of this race and sex discrimination operates through the established class system. Income inequality in general is related to positions within authority structures. So if we find sex and race differences in relation to these other factors affecting income inequality in general we have located other sources of sex and race inequality operating through the class system (Hulme & Toye, 2006). The main point is that race and sex income inequality is explained by class, although racism and sexism do play a part. Race and sex inequality are in large part class issues and operate through class divisions made up of occupational, authority, and property divisions in the overall system of stratification in this country. As with income the condition of work is stratified. Those on top are generally better off, while those in the middle can look down upon those at the bottom with a feeling that their own condition could be worse. Income inequalities, job satisfaction, conditions of work, and different amounts of political and economic power are the most important consequences of class in the United States (Rimashevskaia & Kislitsyna, 2006). A central belief in the conflict perspective of social stratification is that groups with strong common interests will work together to ensure that these common interests are attained and maintained. This is true for groups on the bottom as well as for those on top. But this is only true to the extent that a group with common interests is able to recognize its common interests, and has resources with which to gain it common interest. Those on the top of the stratification system are usually able to have both of what was mentioned. But those that are below the top are usually powerless, passive or non participants in the conflict process of reward distribution in the society (Barber, 1957). The global view of social stratification shows that it is in many ways similar to domestic systems of stratification. There are some differenced between the two types of systems. For one the phenomenon of nationalism can produce less international class unity and more of an overt class conflict between the core and the outside. It is more difficult to maintain the world stratification system through ideological justifications because of cultural differences and communication differences. But it can be seen as a property structure and occupational division of labor that stretches around the globe that isn’t related to bureaucratic authority structures. One should note that it isn’t the differences domestically and globally on social stratification it is the similarities that are surprising (Hulme & Toye, 2006). Works Cited: Barber, Bernard. Social Stratification a Comparative Analysis of Structure and Process, New York: Harcourt, (1957). Giddins, Anthony & Held, David. Classes, Power and Conflict: Classical and Contemporary debates. Berkeley: University of California Press, (1982). Hulme, David, & Toye, John. â€Å"The Case for Cross Disciplinary Social Science Research on Poverty, Inequality and well being. † Journal of Development Studies 42. 7 (October 2006): 1085-1107. Liao, Tim. â€Å"Measuring and Analyzing class Inequality with the Gini Index Informed by Model-Based Clustering. † Sociological Methodology 36. 1 (2006): 201-224. Rimashevskaia, N. M. & Kislitsyna, O. A. â€Å"Income Inequality and Health. † Sociological Research 45. 3 (May/June, 1006): 43-62.

Analysis Of Secretary Of Defense And The Islamic State Of...

NSPS Background Paper - ISIS TO: SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 18 November 2016 THRU: UNDERSECRETARY OF DEFENSE (POLICY) FROM: ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS) SUBJECT: Strategy to Halt and Reverse the ISIS Threat 1. POLICY DECISION AND OBJECTIVES: On September 10, 2014, the President released a strategy to combat the increasing threats posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). This strategy has one clear goal, to diminish and defeat the threat of ISIS not only to the United States but also to the world. The objectives in the policy address the use of all instruments of national power. The President has asked the Department of Defense to re-evaluate the current policy and provide alternate solutions to the growing threat of ISIS to the security of the United States homeland and interests abroad. 2. BACKGROUND / NATIONAL INTERESTS: The group known as ISIS today is not new. This group, or factions of the group, has been in the Middle East since the early 1990s. Its lineage is traced back to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, then eventually it morphed into al-Qaeda Iraq, then transitioned into ISIS. As Bobby Ghosh mentions in his article for The Atlantic, â€Å"The group is now able and willing to seize and control territory, not simply send suicide bombers to their death.† ISIS has evolved into a global threat based on its ability to gain and seize territory while inflicting terror on surrounding nations in the Middle East andShow MoreRelatedA Protracted Struggle Ahead For Iraq2480 Words   |  10 PagesKhamenei, and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on the conflict in Iraq, where Khamenei blames the conflict on extremist and remnants of Husseins military and Kerry blames Iraq’s sectarian rule. Through academic journals and news articles I will show the sectarian policie s enforced by Maliki s rule caused political instability and military and governmental weakness that generated the extremist ideologies in which fuel the ISIS advances. In Bill Ardolino and Bill Roggio’s analysis: â€Å"A protractedRead MoreThe Presidential Policy Directive Regarding The Organization Of The National Security2267 Words   |  10 Pagesmembership of the National Security Council to include the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, Secretary of Homeland Security, US Ambassador to the United Nations, the Chief of Staff, and the National Security Advisor. Depending on the situation involved, other members may be included based on their areas of expertise. If the NSC met to address an international economic matter, for instance, the meeting would also include the Secretary of Commerce, the US Trade Representative, the AssistantRead MoreHow Isil s Current Territory Is Not The Group s First Attempt1801 Words   |  8 Pagesfirst attempt at creating a state. In 2006, the precursor to the group, al-Qaeda in Iraq, used an anti-Shiite agenda to ally with Sunni tribes in Western Iraq and establish control, forming the Islamic State in Iraq 2 (ISI) in the process [1]. However, the group’s violence convinced these same tribes to rebel and drive out ISI in late 2006, during what is known as the Anbar Awakening [2]. The chaos brought about by the Syrian Civil War and instability in Iraq provided ISI a second opportunityRead MoreThe War On Terrorism And Terrorism1614 Words   |  7 Pagesand unease about the role and status of the United States of America permeates the air. Islamophobic attacks increase by 1,700% in 2001. Prior to 9/11, the FBI recorded just 28 hate crimes against Muslims. The following year it increased to 481. For visible Muslims, the threat of violence and abuse is even higher (especially for women). Another fact 9/11 or 7/7 were often labeled as conspiracy theories, but more in-depth investigations and analysis can bring out the truth behind each of these geopoliticalRead MoreThe Fluctuating Fortunes Of Counterinsurgency : Is Tossing The Coin A Reasonable Approach?3422 Words   |  14 PagesCounterinsurgency: Is Tossing the COIN a Reasonable Approach? In his compelling and prescient testimony in June 2004 to the United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee, The â€Å"Post Conflict† Lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan, Anthony Cordesman outlined â€Å"critical failures of American understanding of the world that it faces in the 21st century, and in the nature of asymmetric warfare and defense transformation.† The failures he articulates and the prescription for their remedy appear to logically work hand inRead MoreTerrorism Is An International And Domestic Problem Essay2339 Words   |  10 Pagesorganizations that have made a major impact on the U.S. are The Al Qaeda Organization and The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria also known as ISIS. These two organizations have been very active in terrorizing countries around the world including the U.S. leaving painful scars on the American people. Identification Foreign Terrorist Organizations are foreign organizations that are labeled by the Secretary of State in accordance with section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. (U.S. Department,Read MoreThe Character Of 21st Century Warfare2508 Words   |  11 Pagesfought through asymmetric means to advance the values and interests of state and non-state actors. I will first introduce contemporary evidence of 21st century warfare, and then select Sun Tzu’s principals of war – national unity, rational appraisals of relative power, and victory is the objective3 – to contextualize and explain the following characters of war: political objectives, tactics, technology, and friction.4 My analysis also draws from Clausewitz’ theory on war’s subjective nature with hisRead MoreWith The Election Of Donald J. Trump, The United States1825 Words   |  8 PagesWith the election of Donald J. Trump, the United States has met a strong change of position in the international playing field. The Obama years, characterized by periods of soft power playing and reliance on international frameworks with intermittent reliance on military intervention, have been all but cast aside by a President often associated with ideals of isolationism. Foreign policy can change throughout administrations, but the scale at which these two administrations differ in how they seeRead MoreThe Integration Of Uzbekistan And Islamic State5043 Words   |  21 PagesSharia making it an Islamic State. The IMU did not agree with the way Islom Karimov was running Uzbekistan as president (encyclopedia of espionage, 2015, para. 1). Osama Bin Laden provided the IMU with 130,000 dollars in a t rip to the mountains of Tajikistan. The money was handed directly to Namangani who was the current financier for the IMU (Ruzaliev, 2004, para. 9). According to Ruzaliev (2004), â€Å"A few weeks later, a meeting took place in Karachi between the members of Islamic organizations fromRead MoreNational Security Outline Essay40741 Words   |  163 PagesTheories of Confidence-Building Measures 79 J.N. Moore, Law and the Indochina War 81 Henkin, Is there a ‘Political Question’ Doctrine? 82 STANDING 83 JNM, SOLVING THE WAR PUZZLE, September 11th Its Aftermath: Terrorism, Afghanistan, The Iraq War 84 Incentive Theory Terrorism 84 Low Intensity Conflict and the International Legal System, JNM 89 Recommendations for Strengthening the International Legal System to Deal More Effectively with Low-Intensity Aggression 90 THE RULE OF LAW